Can My Landlord Forfeit My Rental Deposit in Malaysia?

A landlord cannot automatically keep your rental deposit simply because the tenancy has ended or there has been a disagreement. Whether the deposit can be forfeited or deducted depends mainly on the tenancy agreement, the reason the tenancy ended and whether the landlord can prove the loss said to justify the deduction.

There is also an important point that many tenants miss. Malaysia still does not have a Residential Tenancy Act or a statutory tenancy deposit protection scheme in force. Residential tenancy disputes remain governed largely by the tenancy agreement and general Malaysian contract law.

Malaysia still does not have a Residential Tenancy Act

As at 2026, Malaysia's proposed Residential Tenancy Act remains under development and has not yet become law.

The Government has confirmed that dedicated residential tenancy legislation is being finalised as part of the National Housing Policy 2026 to 2035. Proposals discussed publicly have included clearer tenancy rules, a standard tenancy agreement, a dedicated dispute mechanism and a possible centralised system for holding deposits.

Those proposals should not be confused with the law that applies today.

There is currently no statutory system requiring every residential landlord to place your deposit into a government-controlled escrow account, and there is no dedicated residential tenancy tribunal operating under a Residential Tenancy Act.

For now, the tenancy agreement remains extremely important.

Start with your tenancy agreement

Most tenancy agreements state:

• how much security deposit is paid;
• whether there is a separate utility deposit;
• what the deposit is intended to secure;
• when it must be returned;
• what the landlord is entitled to deduct; and
• what happens if the tenancy ends early.

The first question is therefore not simply, "Can the landlord keep my deposit?"

The better question is: what does the tenancy agreement actually allow the landlord to do with it?

A security deposit is usually intended to protect the landlord against specific risks such as unpaid rent, unpaid utility charges or damage beyond ordinary wear and tear.

It is not normally a general fund that the landlord can keep because the tenancy ended badly.

Can the landlord simply forfeit the whole deposit?

Not necessarily.

If the tenancy agreement expressly states that the deposit may be forfeited upon a particular breach, the clause must be examined carefully together with the circumstances of the termination.

Where there is no applicable forfeiture provision, the landlord will generally need a proper legal basis for withholding the money.

In Cellular Communication Network (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd v Zainah Al-Attas Sdn Bhd [1994] 5 MLRH 379, the court considered a tenancy where the tenant had terminated early. The landlord sought to retain the rental deposit even though there were no outstanding rental arrears.

The court treated the deposit according to its contractual purpose as security for the payment of rent. Once there were no rent arrears for the deposit to secure, the landlord could not simply keep it as compensation for everything allegedly lost because of the early termination.

The landlord might still have a damages claim, but that is different from automatically forfeiting the deposit.

What if the tenancy agreement contains a forfeiture clause?

An express clause can strengthen the landlord's position, but it still has to apply to what actually happened.

For example, a tenancy agreement may say that the security deposit is forfeited if the tenant abandons the premises without giving the required notice.

If the tenant does exactly that, the landlord may have a contractual argument for forfeiture.

However, the result may be different if the landlord accepts the tenant's early surrender.

In Pin Hwa Properties Sdn Bhd v G7 Retail Malaysia Sdn Bhd [2023] MLRHU 1143, the landlord accepted the return of possession, took back the keys, appointed security personnel and advertised the premises for a new tenant.

The court considered the landlord's conduct important when assessing whether it could nevertheless retain the deposits under the tenancy arrangement.

The practical point is that the written clause and what the parties actually did must be considered together.

A landlord who clearly accepts the tenancy ending may face difficulty later relying on a clause intended for a completely different form of breach.

Can the landlord deduct the cost of damage?

Yes, where the tenancy agreement allows it and the damage can be properly established.

However, the landlord should be able to show that the damage was caused by the tenant and that the amount deducted represents a genuine cost of repair.

There is also an important distinction between damage and ordinary wear and tear.

A tenant who damages a door, breaks fittings or leaves holes in walls may be responsible for reasonable repair costs.

Normal deterioration from everyday occupation is different. A landlord should not normally use a tenant's security deposit to renovate the property or replace items simply because they are older at the end of the tenancy.

The landlord should be able to prove the deduction

A landlord who says RM8,000 was spent repairing tenant damage should be able to show how that figure was reached.

In GTI Industries Sdn Bhd v Thun Huang Sdn Bhd [2014] MLRHU 905, the landlord's claim concerning the condition of the premises was weakened by the absence of proper supporting evidence. Among other matters, there was no contemporaneous protest at handover and insufficient evidence connecting the alleged rectification costs to the tenant.

For residential tenants, this has a practical lesson.

Take photographs and videos when you move in and when you move out. Keep the inventory list, defect reports, WhatsApp messages and evidence that the keys were returned.

The landlord should likewise inspect the property promptly and document any damage relied upon.

A dispute becomes much harder when both parties wait several months and rely only on their recollection of the property's condition.

What about unpaid rent and utility bills?

These are among the most common legitimate reasons for deductions.

If rent remains unpaid when the tenancy ends and the security deposit was expressly intended to secure rent obligations, the landlord may be entitled to deduct the arrears.

The same applies to a utility deposit where electricity, water or other agreed charges remain outstanding.

However, the landlord should provide a clear calculation.

If the security deposit is RM6,000 and there is RM1,000 in genuine unpaid rent, that does not automatically justify keeping the entire RM6,000 unless another contractual basis exists for retaining the balance.

The remaining amount should ordinarily be dealt with according to the tenancy agreement.

What if I ended the tenancy early?

Early termination is one of the most common reasons for deposit disputes.

The answer depends on the termination clause.

Some tenancy agreements contain a break clause allowing early termination after a stated period or with a particular notice period. Others require the tenant to remain for the full fixed term unless the landlord agrees otherwise.

If the tenant leaves in breach of the fixed term, the landlord may have a claim for losses caused by that breach.

But the existence of a possible damages claim does not always mean that the landlord can automatically treat the entire deposit as forfeited.

The landlord's subsequent conduct also matters. If the landlord agrees to take back possession and immediately rents the property to someone else, the actual financial loss may be very different from what the landlord initially claims.

This is why early termination should ideally be recorded in writing, including what happens to the deposit.

What happens after the fixed tenancy expires?

Problems can also arise when a tenant stays after the original tenancy period and the landlord continues accepting monthly rent.

Depending on the facts, a periodic tenancy may arise.

In Top Speed Property Management Sdn Bhd v VMall Enterprise Sdn Bhd [2026] MLRHU 1266, the High Court considered the effect of a fixed tenancy expiring while rent continued to be accepted. The court did not simply treat every provision of the expired agreement, including forfeiture provisions, as automatically continuing into the later monthly tenancy.

For tenants and landlords, this is another reason not to assume that an old tenancy clause continues indefinitely simply because occupation continues.

If the tenancy is renewed or allowed to continue, the parties should document the new arrangement.

What if the landlord refuses to collect the keys?

A tenant should keep evidence showing that possession was genuinely offered back.

In Kam Swee Keong v Low Wen Loong & Anor [2026] MLRHU 210, the tenant had attempted to return the keys, but the landlord did not attend to receive them. The court rejected the landlord's attempt to treat the tenant as having unjustifiably remained in possession and ordered the balance of the deposit to be returned.

The practical lesson is to document the handover.

Arrange a date and time in writing, take photographs of the vacant premises and record your attempt to return the keys. If the landlord refuses to cooperate, keep that correspondence.

How should you demand your deposit back?

Start by reading the deposit and termination clauses carefully and calculating exactly what should be returned.

Then collect the tenancy agreement, proof of the deposit payment, rental payment records, utility statements, move-in and move-out photographs, inventory records and evidence that the keys were returned.

Ask the landlord in writing to identify every deduction being made and provide supporting documents such as invoices or repair receipts.

If the landlord continues withholding the deposit without proper justification, the next step may be a formal letter of demand seeking repayment within a specified period.

If payment is still refused, a civil claim may be considered depending on the amount involved and the circumstances. The general approach to recovering money someone refuses to pay applies to a withheld deposit in the same way as to any other debt.

Many deposit disputes end in a negotiated figure. If that happens, record the agreed amount and payment date in writing, and read any settlement document carefully before signing it.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can my landlord keep my whole deposit because I ended the tenancy early?

Not automatically. Check the early termination and forfeiture clauses. The landlord's acceptance of the early termination and the actual loss suffered may also be relevant.

Can the landlord deduct money for damage?

Yes, where the tenant is responsible and the tenancy agreement permits the deduction. The landlord should be able to prove the damage and the reasonable repair cost.

Is normal wear and tear deductible?

Ordinary deterioration from normal occupation should be distinguished from actual tenant-caused damage. The tenancy agreement and evidence of the property's condition will be important.

Is there a Malaysian law requiring my deposit to be held in escrow?

Not currently. Malaysia's proposed residential tenancy reforms have discussed a centralised deposit mechanism, but no statutory residential tenancy deposit scheme is presently in force.

Final takeaway

A landlord does not have an unlimited right to keep a tenant's security deposit.

The tenancy agreement determines what the deposit secures, when it should be returned and what deductions may be made. If the landlord relies on unpaid rent, utility charges or property damage, those deductions should have a proper contractual basis and be supported by evidence.

Tenants should therefore avoid treating the deposit as automatically refundable in every situation, while landlords should avoid treating it as an automatic penalty whenever a tenancy ends badly.

The strongest position for either side comes from a clear tenancy agreement and proper records showing the condition of the property, payments made, termination arrangements and handover of possession.

Speak to JPP LAW

Justin, Poh & Partners, also known as JPP LAW, assists clients with tenancy disputes, recovery of rental deposits, unpaid rent, early termination disputes, possession issues, letters of demand and civil proceedings in Malaysia.

If your landlord is refusing to return your deposit, or you are a landlord considering deductions from a tenant's security deposit, you may contact us to assess the tenancy agreement, evidence and available remedies.

---

Disclaimer: This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Tenancy deposit disputes depend heavily on the wording of the tenancy agreement, the reason the tenancy ended, the condition of the premises, outstanding payments and the conduct of both parties.